Analysis: Core M benchmarks: Why this CPU is the perfect candidate for the Surface 4 Pro

Analysis: Core M benchmarks: Why this CPU is the perfect candidate for the Surface 4 Pro

The first Broadwell processors from Intel may well have been rather heavily delayed, but we’ve tested the new 14nm Core M CPUs and they some of the most impressive mobile silicon we’ve ever seen.

The 6W TDP Broadwell tablet we’ve got sat in front of us is more than capable of consistently besting a Surface Pro 3 in the performance benchmark stakes – as well as in power, thermals and volume tests too.

Microsoft must be cursing the delays that stopped it from being able to use these powerful processors in its latest top end tablet device.

We met up with Intel’s performance benchmarking team at this year’s Intel Developer Forum and were whisked up to a suite over-looking sun-bleached San Francisco for some playtime with its Llama Mountain reference tablet.

Inside is one of the first top-end 14nm Broadwell mobile chips, the teeny-tiny Core M 5Y70. It’s a dual-core, quad-thread, processor rocking the latest Core architecture, but able to squeeze into a thermal design envelope of generally just 4.5W.

We say generally because the Core M CPUs are all capable of three different design points – either the standard 4.5W, a ‘down-config’ of 3W or an ‘up-config’ of 6W. The actual device manufacturers are the ones to decide what their products run at.

‘Right now the OEM has control over that,’ explained Intel’s ingénieur extraordinaire, Francois Piednoel. ‘But there is nothing to stop them from making the software to change that.’

The 3W ‘down-config’ mode is all about extending battery life and the 6W ‘up-config’ is all about max performance if the manufacturer’s thermal design can cope with it.

But that’s not the full story.

The TDP is an average thermal design over a given time, not the maximum Wattage a given Core M system will hit. Intel contends that it’s more efficient to hit peak performance as fast as possible with higher power and steam through a processing task, than ramp up slowly and take your time.

‘One of the strengths of Core M,’ we were told, ‘is we have found ways to ramp very quickly from 500MHz to 2.6GHz, and that gives us awesome responsiveness.’

The way Intel does this is to briefly spike the CPU up to 15W for a couple of microseconds in order for it to hit its top Turbo speed as quickly as possible.

‘If I want to raise my voltage very fast and I want to go from 500MHz to 2.6GHz,’ explained Piednoel. ‘I better crank up the wattage just for a few micro-seconds just to get my voltage up. If you measure very closely you will see a peak, but that’s not the TDP.’

Intel showed us three different thermal designs based on its Llama Mountain reference tablet: each replacing the backplate with either a full aluminium design, an aluminium with gold plating and a final one with an incredibly heavy copper backplate (‘because we wanted to kill a fly with a hammer,’ explained Piednoel). Each design effectively turned the rear of the tablet into a huge heatsink.

All the extra engineering work went into trying to make a design to get the most out of the new Core M, without having to throw a fan into the mix.

‘We went gold, we went copper,’ said Piednoel. ‘And without coming out of the spec of Core M we got the same result on all of them. So you don’t need to go crazy cooling to get the best performance on Core M. You just need the usual tablet design and you’re good to go.’

So what about the actual results?

Comparing the ‘up-config’ Llama Mountain reference design with the Core i5 4300 Surface Pro 3 the actual CPU performance is about 5% lower testing Cinebench’s multi-threaded rendering benchmark.

Considering that’s a 6W CPU vs. a 15W CPU, and the Core i5 is Turbo-ing some 300MHz quicker, that’s not a bad shout for the powerful li’l Core M chip.

And when you look at the Sunspider test, showing just how quickly the Core M 5Y70 can get to its 2.6GHz peak speed, it’s definitely got the Surface Pro 3 licked. The Core M’s score of 115ms vs. the Core i5′s 196ms makes it some 70% quicker.

The 14nm Broadwell ‘Tick’ isn’t just about the die-shrink either, as even with the Core M Broadwell chips you’re getting more of a ‘Tick Plus’ on the processor graphics. The HD 5300 graphics of the Core M has an extra four execution units over the HD 4400 graphics in the Surface Pro 3.

And, even though the top clockspeeds of the two GPU parts are completely different – 850Mhz, vs. 1.1GHz – the Broadwell graphics obviously have the edge.

In Futuremark’s 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited benchmark, the slower-clocked HD 5300 is able to post a score of 50,439 compared with the 48,173 score the HD 4400 is able to post.

The other thing to remember about the Surface Pro 3 is that it’s using active cooling and is also a chunk thicker than the Llama Mountain reference design. The fanless Core M though is still able to replicate it’s benchmarks consistently so long as the ambient temperature remains constant.

The Surface Pro 3 on the other hand is a martyr to its thermal design. In order to keep it down to some 9mm the 15W CPU can only hit its peak performance speeds in short bursts, over longer term use it will throttle back its performance to keep the thermals down.

Something that wont happen with a Core M design. Even if it comes in at around 7mm thick without any fans whatsoever.

This is the power of Intel’s first Broadwell chip and why, given all the delays the new microarchitecture has suffered along the path to 14nm, making sure it got the Core M out first was by far Intel’s best play.

While the rest of the Broadwell chips are unlikely to be anything to write home, the Core M parts are looking to be the finest mobile parts Intel’s ever produced.

Por Administrador
Administrador del Sitio
Publicado el 22 de September del 2014
Last Comments

Recent Comments